Treat the agent as part of the development loop
Agentic software development is not handing a vague feature request to a model and hoping for a finished product. It is a workflow where an agent can inspect evidence, propose a plan, use bounded tools, and produce a change that a developer can review and validate.
This mirrors good engineering practice. The agent accelerates investigation and execution, while the developer retains responsibility for scope, trade-offs, and acceptance criteria.
Use a five-step loop
A repeatable loop prevents both the developer and the agent from jumping to edits before the problem is understood.
- Inspect: gather the error, affected files, and current Git state.
- Plan: state the intended change and validation before writing.
- Execute: use only the tools and permissions the task needs.
- Review: inspect the diff, tool activity, and unexpected changes.
- Verify: run tests, checks, or a concrete manual validation.
Make the handoff explicit
A good agent response identifies what changed, what it verified, and what remains uncertain. That makes it useful during a pull-request review or a later debugging session, not just at the moment a patch appears.
Truss supports this loop with Chat for questions, Plan for read-only investigation, Agent for permitted execution, durable workspace state, and Git-aware views for review.
Next steps
Put it to work in your own workspace.
Pick the surface that fits your day, then connect a model you control.
FAQ
Questions developers ask before switching.
What is agentic software development?
It is a development approach where agents participate in a structured engineering loop, using context and tools under human-defined boundaries rather than acting as a one-shot code generator.
Does agentic development replace code review?
No. It can improve preparation and execution, but diffs, tests, and human acceptance remain essential.